Regulation, Law & GovernanceUS District Court for the Northern District of California (Judge Orrick)US District Court for the Northern District of California

Andersen v. Stability AI: motion to dismiss granted in part, denied in part

Made by AIWritten by AI (Claude) from the source below. Check anything important against the source.How it's made

Andersen v. Stability AI motion to dismiss granted in part and denied in part — a ruling on a motion to dismiss, not a judgment on the merits. Direct and induced infringement claims survived; DMCA Section 1202 claims were dismissed in full

Why it matters

The first case over image-generation model training to move into substantive proceedings

Source — Primary sources first; secondary reports are labelled “Press”

Officiallaw.justia.comhttps://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2023cv00201/407208/223/

Added in Week 35, 2026 · See that week

On the map — ⑮ Regulation, Law line

  1. Previous stopAI Act
  2. This recordAndersen v. Stability AI: motion to dismiss granted in part, denied in part
  3. Next stopAI Act Chapters 1 and 2 (prohibited practices, AI literacy) begin to apply
See it on the map

Same week

Hermes 3OfficialGraph Retrieval-Augmented GenerationPaperAnthropic launches prompt caching in public betaOfficialxAI releases Grok-2 / Grok-2 mini in betaOfficial

Nearby on the same axis

AI Act enters into forcePressRegulation (EU) 2024/1689 published in the Official JournalGovernmentCalifornia governor vetoes SB 1047GovernmentCouncil of the EU gives final approval to the AI ActPress