Regulation, Law & GovernanceUS District Court for the District of Delaware (Judge Bibas)
Court rejects fair use for AI training in Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence
AIMade by AIWritten by AI (Claude) from the source below. Check anything important against the source.How it's made
Revised summary judgment in Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence — a first-instance summary judgment. Rejected fair use for AI training
Why it matters
But the court stated explicitly that only non-generative AI was before it that day. Citing it as generative AI precedent is wrong
Source — Primary sources first; secondary reports are labelled “Press”
Pressjenner.comhttps://www.jenner.com/en/news-insights/client-alerts/court-decides-that-use-of-copyrighted-works-in-ai-training-is-not-fair-use-thomson-reuters-enterprise-centre-gmbh-v-ross-intelligence-incAdded in Week 35, 2026 · See that week
On the map — ⑮ Regulation, Law line
- Previous stopAI Act Chapters 1 and 2 (prohibited practices, AI literacy) begin to apply
- This recordCourt rejects fair use for AI training in Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence
- Next stopChina issues measures for labelling AI-generated and synthetic content